What actually happens.
Objective work results provide a view of outcomes. Business systems contribute P&L, KPIs, tickets and quality metrics.
- P&L & business results
- KPIs & operational performance
- Tickets & quality metrics
Bring objective results, human perspectives and psychological context into a connected picture. Use it to ask better questions and support considered decisions.
Objective work results provide a view of outcomes. Business systems contribute P&L, KPIs, tickets and quality metrics.
Self-review, peer review and manager assessment add different perspectives. Differences between them become a reason for conversation.
Motivation, psychological DNA and team dynamics help frame questions and choose a supportive approach. Context requires careful interpretation.
The team missed a delivery goal. The result tells us what changed.
The team reports competing priorities. Reviews add a perspective that the delivery metric alone cannot show.
Different communication preferences suggest a clearer planning conversation. This is a hypothesis to discuss, not a diagnosis.
DNA combines thirteen psychometric instruments across eight themes. It supports understanding, communication and team conversations.
DNA is never used for promotion or termination decisions. Psychological information requires careful interpretation. It does not diagnose a condition or predict behavior with certainty.
ECR (General), ECR-Father
ERQ, CERQ, DERS
TIPI (Big Five)
PMQ, RFQ-15
GAD-7
RFQ-8, SQS-10
ICQ-15
MTQ-10
These are capabilities of the internal platform. The site explains their purpose without exposing employee profiles or sensitive data.
Compare two profiles, identify similarities and differences, and explore complementary ways of working. Comparison extends to team and department distributions.
Read interpretations across the assessment scales and their relationships. Full reports support a more considered conversation and can be exported to PDF.
Generate a short explanation with a chosen focus, such as team dynamics, communication or resilience. AI interpretation still requires human review.
Explore questions using permitted information in a specific profile. The platform supports profile-based dialogue; this presentation site does not process employee data.
Side-by-side profiles reveal similarities and differences, supporting conversations about communication and joint work.
Aggregated profiles provide context for how a team collaborates and where different approaches may help.
Department comparisons use a consistent scale and permitted comparison bases, from company to team.
AI prepares explanations and reports using permitted information. People remain responsible for interpretation, conversations and decisions.
Profile summaries, detailed reports and questions grounded in the permitted data of a specific profile.
Support for interpreting team characteristics, collaboration and differences in working styles.
Aggregated analysis across organizational levels, within the viewer’s access scope.
AI summary expansion beyond DNA to the wider employee profile is part of the active roadmap.
Performance brings work results together with self, peer and manager assessment. DNA remains a separate source of supportive context.
Eleven direct questions help managers examine their assessment rather than defaulting to an uninformative middle rating. The four themes are value and loyalty, strategic fit, impact and behavior.
The first performance cycle with the new methodology remains a next-horizon priority.